By Philip . . . Court Dismisses Registry Fee Case Without Prejudice – Obligations Remain.
Update on Kaso et al. v. Mitchell (S.D. W. Va.)
A federal court has dismissed the lawsuit challenging West Virginia’s sex offender registry fee, but the case is not over.
What the Court Decided
- The judge granted the State’s motion to dismiss, meaning the current version of the lawsuit cannot proceed.
- Importantly, the case was dismissed without prejudice.
- This dismissal type means the Court did not issue a final ruling on whether the law is constitutional.
- The plaintiffs are allowed to revise and refile the case.
Why the Case Was Dismissed
The Court’s decision focused on technical legal requirements, not a full evaluation of the claims:
- Eighth Amendment (Excessive Fines)
- The Court found the complaint did not sufficiently show that the $125 annual fee is “grossly disproportionate” to the underlying offenses.
- Without that showing, the claim could not move forward.
- Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process and Equal Protection)
- The Court determined the complaint did not establish:
- Unconstitutional unequal treatment under current legal standards, or
- A requirement for additional procedural protections (such as hearings before fees or liens are imposed).
- The Court determined the complaint did not establish:
- The judge did not definitively rule on whether the fee is punitive or unconstitutional.
What “Dismissed Without Prejudice” Means
- The case is temporarily closed, not permanently ended.
- The Court identified deficiencies in how the claims were presented, not necessarily in the underlying legal arguments.
- The plaintiffs have the opportunity to:
- Amend the complaint, and
- Refile the case with additional detail or legal support
What Happens Next
- The legal team is actively analyzing the Court’s decision.
- A strategy for next steps, including potential refilling, is being developed.
- An update is expected within 1–2 weeks.
Advisory for Constituents
While the legal challenge is ongoing, the current law remains in effect. Constituents should be aware of the following practical considerations:
- The 2026 $125 registry fee is still required
- Payment is due no later than June 30, 2026
- Payments must be made through your local county clerk’s office
- Failure to pay may result in enforcement action
- If the fee is not paid, the West Virginia State Police may request a property lien beginning July 31, 2026
- The Court’s recent ruling does not pause or suspend these requirements
- The dismissal does not change current obligations under state law
Practical Guidance
- Plan ahead for the payment deadline to avoid penalties or complications
- Keep documentation of any payments made
- Confirm payment procedures with your local county clerk if you have questions about logistics.
Bottom Line
- No final decision on constitutionality has been made
- The registry fee requirement remains fully in effect
- Further legal action is being evaluated, and updates are forthcoming
Court’s dismissal decision: Kaso et al. v. Mitchell v2.25-cv-00603_v5-4-26_Courts Ruling on STATEs_Motion-to-Dismiss
NARSOL/WVRSOL Constituent updated: WVRSOL_Constituent_Update #5_5-9-2026

